Although it is welcome and overdue that the Supreme Court finally adopted an ethics code for its justices on Monday, the approach is seriously flawed in that it includes no enforcement mechanism.

On Monday, the Supreme Court released a Code of Conduct. As could be predicted, this document did not satisfy the Court's critics. Almost immediately, the document was torn apart: the Justices used ...

Proposals by the International Organization of Securities Commission (IOSCO) to introduce a code of conduct for credit rating agencies (CRAs) are being welcomed by companies and professional ...

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito publicly opposed efforts by Democratic lawmakers to impose a code of ethics on the court, telling the Wall Street Journal Congress doesn’t have “authority” to ...

During the past year a steady stream of public testimonials from female jazz musicians has made clear what most new privately: Sexism and harassment are deeply ingrained in the improvised-music world.

The justices of the United States Supreme Court have insisted time and again that they—unlike every other judge in the country—have no need for a formal code of conduct. They could not be more wrong.

I love ya man, but let's not get all weepy-eyed over the Ten Commandments. It's a code of ethics, and a pretty good one, but it's hardly the only one out there. Sure, Judaism, Christianity and Islam ...